Redefining Professionalism: The Controversy of Glamour in the Workplace
• public
The concept of glamour, often celebrated in the Hollywood golden era by icons like Marilyn Monroe and Grace Kelly, has recently come under scrutiny in a modern workplace context. An employment tribunal, presided over by Judge Park, has deemed the term “glamorous” potentially inappropriate and undermining in a professional setting. This assessment came to light in a ruling that explored the nuances of how such descriptions might be perceived as diminishing one’s seriousness and professionalism.
Evolving Standards: When Glamour Clashes With Professionalism
The controversy centered around Ms Campbell, a barrister with a background as a beauty pageant winner, who argued that her manager’s reference to her as “glamorous” constituted racial discrimination. Despite the tribunal dismissing the claim of racism, it acknowledged that labeling an employee in such a manner could infringe on employment law principles.
This dispute originated in the offices of Waltham Forest Borough Council in East London. Here, Campbell’s manager, Ms Jacobs, referred to Campbell’s workspace as the “glamour corner” during an office tour for a new colleague. Although Jacobs had previously praised Campbell for her meticulous appearance, Campbell found the specific remark derogatory and pursued legal action against the council for race harassment and discrimination.
The Legal Lens on Workplace Glamour: Insights from Recent Tribunal Rulings
The tribunal, however, concluded that Campbell’s interpretation of the comment as racially motivated was unfounded. Details emerged during the tribunal about Campbell’s pursuits outside her legal career, including her accolade as “Ms UK International Elite” in 2019, stemming from her involvement in beauty contests.
From Hollywood to Courtrooms: The Shifting Paradigms of Professional Appearance
Campbell’s tenure at the council, starting in 2018, ended in dismissal two years later due to alleged performance issues, including client complaints. The tribunal acknowledged Campbell’s distress over being introduced as the team’s “glamorous” member but accepted Jacobs’s intention was to compliment, not to discriminate based on race.
Further claims from Campbell regarding racial discrimination, harassment, and victimization, tied to allegations of demeaning treatment, criticism of her work, and negligence in addressing her grievances, were also dismissed. Judge Park emphasised that while the comment might have been ill-judged, it did not have racial undertones or constitute an act of discrimination.
The Judgement & Reasoning:
Ms J Campbell v London Borough of Waltham Forest and others: 3213180/2020
